Legal Opinion

Gronik v. Balthasar

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided August 6, 2015No. Case Nos. 10-cv-0954, 11-cv-0697PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, the Groniks, brought this diversity case against defendant Chubb Indemnity Insurance Company (“Chubb”) to recover for damages to their home under their homeowners’ insurance policy. On March 3, I granted Chubb’s motion to amend its answer to add a counterclaim for a set-off based on plaintiffs’ settlement with the defendants in a related case, the Balthasar case, which has been consolidated with the present case. The Balthasars sold the home in question to plaintiffs. I also allowed limited discovery on the setoff counterclaim. Before…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kendale L. Adams v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Dahmen v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  5. Lagerstrom v. Myrtle Werth Hospital-Mayo Health SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Froedtert South Inc v. StoneDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API