Legal Opinion

State v. Shrum

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1982PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

We granted the State’s Rule 11 application for permission to appeal in order to consider two issues raised by the State: (1) whether the search of the car in which the Defendants were riding and the seizure of stolen tires from that car were reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, and (2) if the seizure was illegal, can the State retry the Defendants on other evidence, or does double jeopardy bar retrial.

THE FACTS

The Defendants Shelby Shrum and her son Johnny Tittle (Shrum), lived in a trailer with Ronnie Kerr. The State’s proof, supported by the testimony of Ronnie…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Houston v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Meadows v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. LeveyeTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. MooreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  4. State v. LongCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  5. State v. BannerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API