Legal Opinion
State v. Moore
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
Decided February 24, 1989PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*374OPINION
JONES, Judge.
The State of Tennessee has appealed to this Court pursuant to Rule 9, Tenn.R. App.P., from an interlocutory order of the trial court suppressing evidence obtained as a result of a search and seizure. Both the trial court and this Court have granted the requisite permission to appeal; and this cause is now ripe for a decision on the merits.
ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW
In this Court the State of Tennessee has raised three (3) issues for our review. The State contends that (a) the defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the motor vehicle searched, (b) the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Lacey Chapman v. Davita, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. StrodeTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. LukeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Peck v. TannerTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.