Legal Opinion
In Re Marsh & McLennan Companies, Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 14, 2007No. MDL No. 1744, Master File No. 04 Cv. 8144(SWK)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRLEY WOHL KRAM, District Judge.
On March 13, 2007, Plaintiff M.F. Henry (“Henry”) filed a Third Amended Complaint (the “TAC”) alleging that corporate defendant Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (“MMC” or the “Company”), as well as various MMC directors (the “Director Defendants”) 1 violated section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 14a-9. 2 The defendants have moved for dismissal pursuant to principles of res judica-ta, Rules 12(b)(6) and 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Private Securities Litigation…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Take-Two Interactive Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- In Re Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. Securities, Derivative, & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Shields v. MurdochDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- In Re Pfizer Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Police & Fire Retirement System v. Safenet, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.