Richardson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
PHIPPS, Presiding Judge.
Steve Richardson appeals from a trial court order denying his motion for discharge and acquittal for an alleged violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. Because we find the trial court’s order is insufficient to allow us to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion, we vacate the judgment and remand the case for entry of an order expressly including proper findings in accordance with Barker v. Wingo.
In Barker v. Wingo, the United States Supreme Court set out a balancing test, in which the conduct of both the prosecution and the defense are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. PorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Higgenbottom v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Goddard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Butler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Cawley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- McDougler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Durham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Gary Durham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.