Legal Opinion

State v. Bradley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 6, 1983No. 833SC193PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

Defendant, in his first argument, contends that the evidence was insufficient to withstand his motion to dismiss.

On a motion to dismiss, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the State, with the State receiving the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. State v. Powell, 299 N.C. 95, 261 S.E. 2d 114 (1980). If there is sufficient evidence that the offenses charged were committed and that defendant was the perpetrator, then the motion is properly denied. State v. Calloway, 305 N.C. 747, 291 S.E. 2d 622 (1982); State v. Powell,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. CallowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. State v. McClintickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API