Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Mayo
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided January 10, 2024No. 3:21-cv-00549Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION KENNETH THOMAS Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 3:21-cv-549-RGJ DETECTIVE WILLIAM MAYO, ET AL. Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Defendants William Mayo, Jonathan Robbins, Curt Flynn, Robert King, Steve Conrad, and Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government (“Metro”) move for summary judgment. [DE 34].1 The Plaintiff, Kenneth Thomas, (“Thomas”) responded in opposition, [DE 45] and Metro replied. [DE 48]. The matter is ripe for adjudication. For the reasons below, the motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. I.…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.