Legal Opinion
In Re Nielsen
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 1, 2001No. 00-BG-1464PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has concluded that respondent, Kenneth E. Nielsen, Jr., violated Rule 8.4(d) conduct that seriously interferes with the administration of justice of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct and D.C. BaR R. XI, § 2(b)(3) by failing to respond in a timely fashion to Bar Counsel’s requests for, and the Board’s order to file, a response to an ethical complaint. The Board recommends that respondent be publicly censured for his misconduct.
Neither Bar Counsel nor respondent has filed an exception to the Board’s report and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re AronDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re ArtisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re BridgesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re MabryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Disciplinary Counsel v. NielsenOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re ArtisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.