Hyldahl v. AT & T

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR DIRECTED VERDICT AND FOR A NEW TRIAL AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING FOR PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge.

On December 14, 2006, Plaintiff Mary-Jo Hyldahl (“Plaintiff’) decided that she was unable to perform her employment duties because she was suffering from depression and post traumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”), serious medical conditions under the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), codified at 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601, et seq. Suspecting fraud, Plaintiffs employer, Defendant AT & T (“Defendant”),…