In re the Claims of Cool
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, J.
Both claimants were town superintendents of highways who failed to win re-election and applied for benefits under the Special Unemployment Assistance Program, The board found claimants to be employees and therefore, eligible. These appeals ensued.
Most of the cases dealing with the issue of whether a claimant is an employee under article 18 of the Labor Law are concerned with whether the relationship is one of employee or independent contractor. The instant claimants do not neatly fit into either category. Our concern, however, is whether an elected town superintendent of highways is an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Claim of MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Matter of Clarke v. Town of RussiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Claim of Clarke v. Town of RussiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- In re Susan Messer Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
3Cited by5 opinions
- White v. Pacifica FoundationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Harrell v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- In re the Claims of CoolNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Matter of McLaughlin (City of Albany--Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Nassau Educational Chapter of the Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. Great Neck Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981