Legal Opinion

Tam v. Missoula County

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2022No. DA 21-0660PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

11/15/2022 DA 21-0660 Case Number: DA 21-0660 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

2022 MT 229

TAI TAM, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MISSOULA COUNTY, acting by and through its BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Defendant and Appellee. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, In and For the County of Missoula, Cause No. DV-21-853 Honorable John W. Larson, Presiding Judge COUNSEL OF RECORD: For Appellant: Alan F. McCormick, Garlington, Lohn & Robinson, PLLP, Missoula, Montana For Appellee: Kirsten H. Pabst, Missoula County Attorney, John W. Hart, Dylan Jaicks, Civil…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. J. Watson v. FWPMontana Supreme Court · 2023
  2. City of Kalispell v. S. DomanMontana Supreme Court · 2026
  3. Estate of Michael Rogel, by and through its personal representative, Mary Rogel v. City of Bozeman, Justin Chaffins, Zachary Garfield, Hannah Helsby, Ryan Jeppson, James Marvich, Jon Ogden, Shawn Toresdahl, Cody Ybarra, and John Doe Defendants 1-100District Court, D. Montana · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API