Legal Opinion
NEXRF Corp. v. Playtika Ltd.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided July 7, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00603Unknown
1Opinion
2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 NEXRF CORP., Case No. 3:20-cv-00603-MMD-CLB 7 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 8 PLAYTIKA LTD., et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 I. SUMMARY 12 Plaintiff NEXREF Corp. sued Defendants Playtika Ltd., Playtika Holding Corp. 13 (collectively, “Playtika”) and Caesars Interactive Entertainment (“Caesars”) for allegedly 14 infringing five patents1 by offering online slot machine games. (ECF No. 1.) Before the 15 Court are Caesars and Playtika’s motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 26, 28),2 and Playtika’s 16 motion for sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Leadsinger, Inc. v. BMG Music PublishingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Jack Allen v. City of Beverly HillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.