Legal Opinion

Williams v. Hill, Harris & Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1939No. 5922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Judge.

The lower court in a well written opinion has correctly set forth the issues of this case and found the facts and arrived at the proper legal conclusion. The opinion is as follows:

“This is a suit for damages arising out of an alleged illegal provisional seizure. The aggregate amount sued for is $1652.50, itemized as follows:

1. For embarrassment, humiliation and mental pain' and suffering . $ 500.00

2. For inconvenience and physical discomfort sustained by plaintiff and his family. 500.00

3. For injuries and damage to petitioner’s credit. 500.00

4. Storage and drayage... 2.50

5.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. M. L. Byrne & Co. v. L. H. Gardner & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  2. Maclas v. LorioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
  3. Pembrook v. GoldmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Burglass v. SheperdLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rivera Santos v. RossiSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API