Legal Opinion

Shenavia MOULDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.; Bert Dewailly, Defendants-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 11, 1991No. 90-7614PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Senior Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff/appellant Shenavia Moulds appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants/appellees Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Bert Dewailly (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Wal-Mart”), finding no unlawful discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., in Wal-Mart’s failure to promote Moulds to the position of receiving department manager. Because we do not find the factual findings of the district court to be clearly erroneous, we affirm.

I

Shenavia Moulds, a black female, was hired by Wal-Mart in October, 1986, as a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cathy S. NEUREN, Appellant, v. ADDUCI, MASTRIANI, MEEKS & SCHILL, Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  2. Turner v. Sungard Business Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Scholz v. RDV Sports, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Smith v. Alabama Dept. of Public SafetyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999
  5. United States v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API