Legal Opinion

State v. LePard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1967No. 500PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The sentence imposed does not exceed the max-

imum sentence authorized by G.S. 14-87 for the offense of robbery with firearms. It is well established that a sentence which does not exceed the maximum prescribed by statute for the offense of which the defendant has been convicted or of which he has entered a plea of guilty does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment forbidden by Article I, § 14, of the Constitution of North Carolina. State v. Bruce, 268 N.C. 174, 150 S.E. 2d 216; State v. Downey, 253 N.C. 348, 117 S.E. 2d 39; State v. Lee, 247 N.C. 230, 100 S.E. 2d 372; State v. Smith, 238…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BruceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. DowneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. State v. . DanielsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SladeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. WestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. HiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. BarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API