State v. Powell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeoCK, J.
Defendant assigns as error that the judgment of the court imposed cruel and ununsual punishment upon defendant. G.S. 14-87, under which defendant was charged and convicted, provides for a sentence of up to thirty years. The sentence imposed upon defendant is well within this limit. Since the year 1838 the Supreme Court of North Carolina has held in an unbroken line of decisions that punishment not exceeding the statutory limit cannot be considered cruel and unusual in the constitutional sense. State v. Manuel, 20 N.C. 144; State v. Pettie, 80 N.C. 367; State v. Farrington, 141 N.C. 844, 53…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. BruceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. YoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. PardonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. . DowdySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. PaulNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. ReavesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. NealCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Heath v. Swift Wings, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.