Legal Opinion
Hardin v. South Carolina Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided April 26, 2004No. 3786PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, J.:
John A. Hardin and Martha Hardin Curran (collectively, “Respondents”) filed a complaint against the South Carolina Department of Transportation (“SCDOT”) in inverse condem nation seeking compensation for the loss in value to two 1 tracts of land they owned on the north side of Dave Lyle Boulevard on either side of its intersection with Baskins and Garrison Roads in Rock Hill, South Carolina, because of the construction of a median barrier in the center of Dave Lyle Boulevard. The trial was bifurcated. A bench trial was held on the sole issue of whether the median’s construction…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Brock v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- City of East St. Louis v. O'FlynnIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Palm Beach County v. TesslerSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Department of Public Works & Buildings v. Wilson & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hardin v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Cobb v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- City of Concord v. StaffordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Tallent v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Hardin v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.