Legal Opinion

Tallent v. South Carolina Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 24, 2005No. 3924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, C.J.:

The South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) appeals the circuit court’s determination that its actions constituted an actionable taking of Elisha Tallent’s property. We affirm.

FACTS

Elisha Tallent purchased commercial property located at 1801 Old Easley Bridge Road in Greenville, and opened a hair salon and tanning facility known as Elisha’s California Hair. Tallent erected a second structure on the property where she operated a consignment shop. Prior to the construction undertaken by SCDOT, Tallent’s property had immediate access to Highway 123 via Old Easley Bridge…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gasque v. Town of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  2. City of Rock Hill v. CothranSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  3. McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Kiawah Property Owners Group v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Gray v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hardin v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  2. Brailsford v. BrailsfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Hardin v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API