Matador Pipelines of Texas, Inc. v. Martin

OPINION

ELLIS, Justice.

Matador Pipelines of Texas appeals a trial court judgment holding that appellant Matador did not have the right or power to condemn land owned by appellee Earl Martin. Although appellant raises four issues on appeal, we believe the decisive issue now before us is whether appellee received adequate notice of the commissioners’ hearing concerning damages for condemnation. After careful review of both the statutory requirements for such notice and the circumstances here presented, we conclude that appellee did receive adequate notice of the condemnation hearing.…