Legal Opinion
Stott v. Bunge Corp.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided August 7, 1992No. CIV 1-92-0028PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JORDAN, District Judge.
This civil action is before the Court for consideration of the report and recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Robert P. Murrian on June 8, 1992 [doc. 14], No party has filed an objection to this report and recommendation, and enough time has passed since the filing of the report and recommendation to treat any objections to it as having been waived. The Court, upon a de novo review of the case, finds that Magistrate Judge Murrian’s report and recommendation states correct findings and conclusions. The Court therefore…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Beatrice Hinds Carland v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Ablamis v. RoperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wilcox v. WilliamsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1999
- York v. YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002