Legal Opinion

State v. Harville

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 29, 1972No. 76253PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Defendant was tried and convicted after bench trial of the offense of criminal drug promotion. ORS *626167.222.① He was sentenced to serve 90 days in the county jail, hut execution of the sentence was suspended by the trial judge. Defendant appeals, contending that the trial court misinterpreted that statute. He makes two assignments of error:

“[I] The court did not give the common and dictionary meaning to the word ‘resorted’ as used in ORS 167.222.”

“[II] The word ‘knowingly’ as used in ORS 167.222 applies to the word ‘resort’ and it was error for the court to enter a judgment of conviction…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AventOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State v. KlossOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State v. GraufCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. McManusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. State v. McManusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API