Legal Opinion
Tiedeman v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 30, 1975No. 74-1538PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.
In this diversity action arising out of a railroad crossing accident plaintiff appeals from the district court’s judgment in favor of the defendant entered on the verdict of the jury and from the court’s *1270denial of plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.1 The jury in special verdicts found the decedent-driver 75% negligent and the Milwaukee Railroad 25% negligent. The court then entered judgments in favor of the railroad on the respective claims of decedent’s administrator and intervenor and awarded the railroad 75% of its counterclaim for damages to its engine against…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Jaffke v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Morley Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Susan Passwaters, by Donald Passwaters, Her Father and Next Friend, and Donald Passwaters v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Jacoboski v. PraxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tiedeman v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul And Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Kuchenbecker v. Northern Wyoming Drilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Kuchenbecker v. Northern Wyoming Drilling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981