Legal Opinion
Board of Education of Central School District No. 1 v. Mancuso Bros.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 2, 1960PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Robert Lynch, J.
Defendants, Ketcham, Miller and Arnold have moved for summary judgment or in the alternative for a stay pending arbitration.
On December 16,1949 plaintiff Board of Education contracted with defendant Ketcham for his architectural services in connection with the design and construction of a school building and bus garage. The defendant, Mancuso Bros., Inc., was the general contractor and the defendant, Peerless Casualty Company is the surety on Mancuso’s maintenance bond.
The complaint alleges that Mancuso represented the building to have been substantially completed on November 27, 1953, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conklin v. DraperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Conklin v. DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Matter of Young v. Crescent Development Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Matter of Haupt v. RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Nagy v. Arcas Brass & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- De Sapio v. KohlmeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- In re the Arbitration between Paver & Wildfoerster & Catholic High School Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Baratta v. KozlowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Lapidus v. ARLEN BEACH CON. ASSOC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Capital Mortgage Corp. v. Coopers & LybrandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.