Walk v. State Compensation Commissioner
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
*230Lovins, President,
dissenting in part:
In my opinion, the two points of the syllabus of the Court’s opinion are correct abstract statements of law. Furthermore, I agree that the first point of the syllabus is applicable to the case at bar. However, I do not believe that the proposition of law stated in the second point of the syllabus is applicable to the record presented us in the present appeal. Hence, this dissent.
Code, 23-4-6, after designating the percentage awards to be made for various specific losses occasioned by a com-pensable injury, none of which admittedly is applicable to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blevins v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
- Vandall v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1931
- Saunders v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
- Scott v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
- Jones v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932