Legal Opinion

Vandall v. State Compensation Commissioner

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1931No. 6966PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge:

Tbe petitioner was injured while employed by a subscriber to tbe workmen’s compensation fund. Tbe injury necessitated amputation of tbe four fingers and tbe palm of a band. He was given an award of 32% disability by the State Compensation Commissioner. Tbe petitioner claims he is entitled to an award of 50% disability and seeks, in this proceeding, a mandamus to require tbe commissioner to give him a bearing on the quantum of tbe award.

Section 31, chapter 68, Acts of 1925, which applies to tbe disability in this case, is as follows: “If tbe injury results in tbe total loss by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McVey v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Sole v. KindelbergerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Meeks v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. Comp. Com.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Walk v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Morris v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Burgees v. Comp. Com'r.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Burgess v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Bragg v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API