Heard v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant insists that we were wrong in holding admissible as evidence of his guilt of selling intoxicating liquor to Arthur Williams, the fact that after indictment he offered said Williams $500.00 to leave the country, and paid $410.00 of said amount. According to the State’s theory Arthur and O. D. Williams went together on May 5, 1929, to appellant’s house and Arthur Tought from him four bottles of beer. The indictment was returned in June following. Arthur Williams testified that about July 14th he had a conversation with appellant relating to the…