Legal Opinion

Barker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 1927No. 11165PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for receiving and concealing stolen property, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant undertakes to raise a number of questions which appear in the record in such condition that we cannot take cognizance of them. There is found in the transcript a document which purports to be objections to the court’s charge. It is not verified by the trial judge and does not recite that it was presented before the main charge was read to the jury. Salter v. State, 78 Tex. Crim. Rep. 325, 180 S. W. 691; Castleberry v. State, 88 Tex. Crim. Rep. 502, 228 S. W. 216;…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Linder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Moseley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Castelberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hardeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Ansley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. State v. CrumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API