Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Vladovic

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1983No. 48656-5Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partUtter, J.

(concurring in part, dissenting in part) — I dissent from the majority's affirmance of the defendant's kidnapping convictions. The defendant will spend a substantial part of the remainder of his life in institutions and under supervision for the robbery and attempted robbery convictions upon which we all agree. The majority's conclusion is not necessary to protect society from the defendant.

The majority's analysis has the effect of adopting a construction of our kidnapping statute which we have carefully avoided in the past and which produces the absurd result of making every armed robber…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. LoganOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API