Brandy Stokes-Reed v. Noah Nesin, M.D., et al.
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE BRANDY STOKES-REED, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) No. 1:25-cv-00422-LEW ) NOAH NESIN, M.D., et al., ) ) Defendants ) RECOMMENDED DECISION AFTER PRELIMINARY REVIEW Because the Court granted Brandy Stokes-Reed’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, see ECF No. 5, her complaint (ECF No. 1) is now before me for preliminary review in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).1 For the following reasons, I recommend that the Court dismiss Stokes-Reed’s complaint. Congress enacted the in forma pauperis statute to ensure meaningful access to federal courts…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.