Legal Opinion

Brandy Stokes-Reed v. Noah Nesin, M.D., et al.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided November 26, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00422Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE BRANDY STOKES-REED, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) No. 1:25-cv-00422-LEW ) NOAH NESIN, M.D., et al., ) ) Defendants ) RECOMMENDED DECISION AFTER PRELIMINARY REVIEW Because the Court granted Brandy Stokes-Reed’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, see ECF No. 5, her complaint (ECF No. 1) is now before me for preliminary review in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).1 For the following reasons, I recommend that the Court dismiss Stokes-Reed’s complaint. Congress enacted the in forma pauperis statute to ensure meaningful access to federal courts…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API