McTigue v. Ettienne
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from,' Sac District Court. — Hon. Z. A. Church, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.
This action was brought for the partition of the E. Yz of the N. E. Y& of section 14, in township 89, range 36, in Sac- county, Iowa; the plaintiff' alleging that he and the defendants, Anna Miles, A. W. Graham, S. H. Graham, and Jesse Graham, were the absolute owners thereof as the sole heirs at law of Eleanor McTigue, deceased. John W. Ettienne and others, appellants, claim that they arid the appellees, Stephen McTigue and Anna Miles, are the absolute owners of the real prop*451■erty in controversy as the sole heirs at law of Patrick McTigue. The rights of the several parties are dependent,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. BodineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Busby v. BusbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Ironside v. IronsideSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Ross ex rel. Ross v. AyrhartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Davis v. CallahanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1886
3Cited by8 opinions
- Canaday v. BaysingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Blackford v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- In Re Estate of DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- In re Estate of BeatySupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Billings v. DeputyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.