Legal Opinion

Langford v. Carr

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1942No. 7813PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Alexander

R. D. Carr and wife owned and occupied 63 acres of land as their homestead. It was their community property, except for a small undivided interest which was the separate property of Mrs. Carr. R. D. Carr died intestate, leaving surviving him his widow and two daughters. The widow continued to occupy the property as her homestead. She and one of her daughters brought this suit against the other daughter for partition of the property. The petition set out the interest owned by each of _ the parties in the fee, but alleged specifically that the interest owned by the two daughters was subject to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moore Son v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Tieman v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hoefling v. HoeflingTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Hoefling v. HoeflingTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Carr v. LangfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Thomas v. McNair, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  2. Griffin v. WolfeTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Campbell v. Tufts, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  4. Long v. Spencer, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
  5. Robert Hardie Tibaut Bowman and Powers L. Bowman v. Molly Bowman Stephens, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API