Legal Opinion

Hoefling v. Hoefling

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1914No. 2404PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals, Fourth District, in an appeal from Bexar County. Mary Hoefling and others obtained writ of error on a judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, reversing that of the court below and rendering judgment against them.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hawkins

William Hoefling, Sr., hereinafter called decedent, and his wife, Dorothea, owned lot 9 in block 16, city block 432, in San Antonio, as community property, and made their home thereon from a date prior to September 17, 1895, until he died in November, 1898. Decedent left surviving him his said wife, who qualified as administratrix of his estate, and their three children-—Budolph, Emma, who married Wolfe, and Henrjr, who conveyed to plaintiff in error, L. Thulemeyer, an undivided one-eighth interest in said lot; also four grandchildren, W. B. Daisy, who married Yoight. G. A., and Willie,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Zwernemann v. RosenbergTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hall v. FieldsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Moore Son v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Childers v. D. J. Henderson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. O'Brien v. WoeltzTexas Supreme Court · 1900

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cline v. NibloTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Grant v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Langford v. CarrTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. McCanless v. DevenportCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Jones v. DewbreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API