Legal Opinion
Mingin v. Continental Can Company
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 26, 1979PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
171 N.J. Super. 148 (1979)
408 A.2d 146
PAUL MINGIN AND XUAN MINGIN, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CONTINENTAL CAN COMPANY, URBANA TOOL & DIE COMPANY, AND JOHN DOE, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Cumberland County.
Decided October 26, 1979.
Mr. Darrell Fineman for plaintiffs (Messrs. Shapiro, Eisenstat, Capizola, O'Neill and Gabage, attorneys).
Mr. James A. Mullen for defendant Continental Can Company (Messrs. Montano, Summer, Mullen & Manuel, attorneys).
MILLER, J.S.C.
This is a motion for summary judgment bottomed upon the theory that defendant is immune from suit under the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boggs v. Blue Diamond Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Emile A. Williams v. McAllister Brothers Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Latham v. Technar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974
- Thomas v. Hycon, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1965
- Seltzer v. IsaacsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lyon v. BarrettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Southern Electrical Supply Co. v. Raleigh County National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Gigax v. Ralston Purina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Peterson v. Trailways, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.