Legal Opinion

Mayberry v. General Orthopedics, PC

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 2005No. 126136PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

704 N.W.2d 69 (2005)

474 Mich. 1201

Keith W. MAYBERRY and Joanna Mayberry, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

GENERAL ORTHOPEDICS, P.C., and William H. Kohen, M.D., Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 126136.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 4, 2005.

Joseph J. Ceglarek, II, and Joseph L. Konheim, Southfield, MI, for the plaintiffs.

James M. Pidgeon, P.C. (by James M. Pidgeon), Troy, MI, for the defendants.

OPINION

2Per curiam

We are presented with the question whether a second notice of intent to sue for medical malpractice tolls the period of limitations when an earlier notice was sent with more than 182 days remaining in…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Waltz v. WyseMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Burton v. Reed City Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Omelenchuk v. City of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. LawMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Ashby v. ByrnesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by18 opinions

  1. Brackett v. Focus Hope, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Clohset v. No Name Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Seyburn, Kahn, Ginn, Bess, Deitch & Serlin, PC v. BakshiMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Hoffman v. BoonsiriMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Young v. NandiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API