Legal Opinion

Foltz Grocery & Baking Co. v. Brown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1924No. 18689PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

While this case arises upon facts similar to those found in the case of Fisher Bros. Co. v. Brown, Secy. of State, ante, 602, 146 N. E. , 100, this day decided, plaintiff in error herein raises a question of law entirely distinct from that raised in the Fisher case. Its sole contention is that the act of the Legislature in changing the line of classification from 35 horse power to 30 horse power, in view of the alleged discrimination which results therefrom, as shown, in plaintiff in error’s view, in the finding of fact by the Court of Appeals, violates Article I, Section 2, and Article II,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Lillard v. MeltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  4. Matter of Application of SchulerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Firestone v. City of CambridgeOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Calerdine v. FreibergOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Mayer v. Ames, Dir.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API