Legal Opinion
Bearup v. Cintas Corporation
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 7, 2022No. 1:21-cv-00151Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI THOMAS BEARUP, JR., et al., : Case No. 1:21-cv-151 Plaintiffs, □ Judge Matthew W. McFarland v CINTAS CORP. NO. 2, Defendant. , ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS (Doc. 39) This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motion to strike class allegations (Doc. 39) and Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to add new plaintiffs to the class action complaint (Doc. 45). Defendant Cintas Corp. No. 2 supplies companies with corporate uniforms. (First Amended Class…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Young v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Larry Butler v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.