Legal Opinion

Goebel v. Brandley

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided April 11, 2002No. 14-01-00533-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHARLES W. SEYMORE, Justice.

This is a boundary dispute case. Appellants Herbert Goebel and Amy Goebel appeal from a judgment declaring a common boundary line with appellee William Brandley, awarding attorney’s fees under the Texas Declaratory Judgments Act, and awarding trespass damages. We affirm.

I. Background

Brandley and the Goebels owned adjoining parcels of land. In 1998, the Goebels trimmed bushes and cleared debris that they believed were located on their property and along the property line they shared with Brandley. Brandley sued the Goe-bels for declaratory, injunctive, and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Oake v. Collin CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. ACS Investors, Inc. v. McLaughlinTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Texarkana Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. MurdockTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Southern States Transportation, Inc. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Martin v. AmermanTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. AIR ROUTING INTERNATIONAL CORP.(CANADA) v. Britannia Airways, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  3. Lile v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  4. Aquaduct, L.L.C. v. McElhenie, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  5. Loera v. Interstate Investment Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API