Legal Opinion

Reserve Insurance Co. v. Apps

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1978No. Civ. 52687PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KINGSLEY, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in an action for declaratory relief. We affirm the judgment.

Charter Insurance Agency was an agent of plaintiff Reserve Insurance Company. Defendant Frank Apps (Frank), through Charter, submitted an application for automobile liability insurance to Reserve. While that application was pending, and on April 19, 1972, Mrs. Apps (Lillian) was involved in an accident with a man named Hubbard, resulting in injuries to Hubbard. At that time, she was driving an automobile rented from Budget Rent-A-Car Company, who had a policy of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cal-Farm Insurance v. BoisserancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ElkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Hurst v. HurstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Quiñones López v. Manzano PozasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1996
  2. Forbes v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Farmers Mutual Insurance v. TuckerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Affiliated FM Ins. v. Kushner CompaniesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  5. Foster v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API