Legal Opinion

Chicago & Erie Railroad v. Kaufman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1921No. 11,233PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Proceeding for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by Grace I. Kaufman and others against the Chicago and Erie Railroad Company and another. From an award for applicants, the defendant named appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBatman, P. J.

— This appeal involves an award against appellant and one John Mann in favor of appellees, who are the widow and children of Charles W. Kaufman, deceased. The finding discloses facts which sustain the award as against said Mann, and in addition thereto it is found, that said Mann “had not complied with section 68 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act at the time of or prior to the injury to said Kaufman.” The finding concludes as follows: “That said Mann was doing work for the Chicago & Erie Railroad Company under contract, and that said Kaufman was laboring upon said work at the time of his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Rose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Levy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Wysong v. NealisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Raynes v. Staats-Raynes Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cole v. Sheehan Construction CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  2. In Re Mid America Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1939
  3. Singer Sewing MacHine Co. v. State Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Livers v. Graham Glass Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Calumet Foundry & Machine Co. v. MrozIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API