Gonzales v. Free Speech Coalition
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
The government appeals the district court’s award of attorneys’ fees to the Free Speech Coalition under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) because the court held the government was not “substantially justified” in defending the Child Pornography Prevention Act (“CPPA”). We reverse. Multiple objective indicia support the reasonableness of the government’s position, including the novelty of the issue involved and the government’s string of successes in defending the CPPA against constitutional attack. We conclude that reasonable minds could have…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Osborne v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Saluja Thangaraja v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Lozano v. AT & T Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Gonzales v. Free Speech CoalitionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- (SS) Henderson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (SS) Wojtowicz v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.