Satterfield v. Medlin
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier
¶1 Appellants Todd and Susan Satterfield (“Satterfields”) filed a complaint against Respondent Ray Medlin (“Medlin”), doing business as Ultimate Construction, in the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, to recover damages as a result of Medlin’s construction of a small log home. The Satterfields brought claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied warranty of habitability, and negligence. After a trial, the jury returned a verdict for Medlin. The Satterfields filed a motion for a new trial based on the District Court’s refusal to instruct the jury on their claim for breach…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chandler v. MadsenMontana Supreme Court · 1982
- Finstad v. W.R. Grace & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
- C. Haydon Ltd. v. Montana Mining Properties, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1997
- Biing Song Lee v. KaneMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- Morgan v. Great Falls School District No. 1Montana Supreme Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Seltzer v. MortonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Giambra v. KelseyMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- McDermott v. CARIE, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- Payne v. KnutsonMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Moore v. BeyeMontana Supreme Court · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.