Legal Opinion

Salvador v. Popaa

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1974No. 5518PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants’ appeal once again brings before the court the authority to award attorneys’ fees. Hawaii follows the traditional American rule that ordinarily ‘‘attorney’s fees cannot be awarded as damages or costs where not so provided by statute, stipulation or agreement.” Defendants assert that this rule requires reversal of the award made plaintiff in the trial court. Plaintiff seeks to sustain the award under an exception to the rule. The background of the case is as follows:

On February 22, 1972, plaintiff Jeanette Salvador, herein referred to as “plaintiff,” was notified that she was no…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Newport News Fire Fighters Ass'n Local 794 v. City of Newport NewsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1972
  5. Jones v. Dieker A.K.A. SmithHawaii Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. TakaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Uyemura v. WickHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Survivors of Wallace Medeiros v. Maui Land & Pineapple Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Cain v. CainHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Ariyoshi v. Hawaii Public Employment Relations BoardHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API