Legal Opinion

State v. Fogel

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2001No. 22887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that, to avoid manifest injustice, the conviction and sentence of Defendant-Appellant Timothy P. Fogel (Defendant) must be vacated because his plea was induced by the expressed inclination of the first circuit court (the court) to defer acceptance of his no-contest plea. Inasmuch as Defendant pled after trial had commenced, he was not eligible, under Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 853-1 (1993 & Supp.2000), for a plea deferral, and, on remand, the only remedy available to him is the withdrawal of his plea.

I

Defendant was charged in a February 3, 1999…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. SacocoHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State v. GumiennyHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. JimHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. GomesHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SumeraHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. De GuairHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. De GuairHawaii Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API