State v. Fogel
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
ACOBA, J.
We hold that, to avoid manifest injustice, the conviction and sentence of Defendant-Appellant Timothy P. Fogel (Defendant) must be vacated because his plea was induced by the expressed inclination of the first circuit court (the court) to defer acceptance of his no-contest plea. Inasmuch as Defendant pled after trial had commenced, he was not eligible, under Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 853-1 (1993 & Supp.2000), for a plea deferral, and, on remand, the only remedy available to him is the withdrawal of his plea.
I
Defendant was charged in a February 3, 1999…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. SacocoHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. GumiennyHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. JimHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. GomesHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SumeraHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. De GuairHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. De GuairHawaii Supreme Court · 2005