Legal Opinion

Carland v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1898PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Shiawassee; Smith, J. Assumpsit by John E. Carland against the Western Union Telegraph Company for failure to deliver a message. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff’s action was brought to recover damages from the defendant for its failure to promptly transmit and deliver a telegram, whereby the plaintiff is said to have suffered a loss. The record contains testimony tending to show that the plaintiff, a merchant, residing at Corunna, called the office of the defendant.at that place by telephone. Mr. Young, defendant’s agent, responded, whereupon the plaintiff asked him to take a message, which he did. The message was as follows, viz.:

“Corunna, Mich., Jan. 25, 1898.
“ To G. W. Wylie Company,
“145 Yan Burén Street,

‘ ‘ Chicago, 111.

“Buy three…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CarewMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Gregory v. WendellMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. W. U. Tel. Co. v. EdsallTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. FosterTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Beasley v. Western Union Tel. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Texas · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Boville v. Dalton Paper MillsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1912
  3. Thomas v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  4. Markley v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. People v. KarollMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API