Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cieslak

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1955No. Appeal, 10PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

Defendant was convicted of the violation of a zoning ordinance, a fine was imposed and she has appealed on an agreed statement of facts. She and her husband, who died after his conviction on the same charge, operate a funeral parlor in the Borough of Brentwood. The business is located on lots purchased by them in' 1950, with a frontage of 120 feet on Brownsville Road and a frontage of 80 feet on Clermont Avenue, all of which are contiguous to one another. The lots facing Brownsville Road are zoned commercial, but those on Clermont Avenue are zoned residential. In 1951…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Zoning Bd. of Adjust. of Park RidgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  2. Atria, Inc. v. Mount Lebanon Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Camaron Apartments, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Hauser v. Borough of Catasauqua Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Botchlett v. City of BethanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API