Legal Opinion
Briggs v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided December 14, 1999No. 99-CV-390CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
CURTIN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On June 8, 1999, plaintiffs James Briggs and Harry Gibbs (“plaintiffs”), representatives of a proposed class, instituted an action against defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (“Goodyear”). Plaintiffs allege that Goodyear has been and is now unjustly enriched by its refusal to comply with a Release and Settlement Agreement (the Agreement) which Goodyear and plaintiffs entered into with the rest of a plaintiff class and the primary defendants from a prior action. See Item 1, ¶ 1. This court reviewed and approved the Agreement on January…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Superintendent of Insurance for New York v. Ochs (In re First Central Financial Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Rickel & Associates, Inc. v. Smith (In Re Rickel & Associates, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Baumgardner v. Bimbo Food Bakeries Distribution, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Tekinsight.Com, Inc. v. Stylesite Marketing, Inc. (In Re Stylesite Marketing, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Reid v. Wolf (In re Wolf)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.