Legal Opinion

Pollock Industries, Inc. v. General Steel Castings Corp.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County

Decided November 8, 1963No. 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, J.,

Plaintiff sued defendant in assumpsit for damages for breach of an alleged oral contract. Plaintiff averred in its complaint that, in September 1959, defendant, through its duly authorized agent, Thomas Ditchfield, orally employed plaintiff to purchase a used boring mill for defendant; that, by custom, brokers charge purchasers 10 percent of the purchase price for such services, and that after plain*384tiff’s representative revealed to defendant’s agent the fact that Westinghouse had a used boring mill for sale, defendant dispensed with plaintiff’s services, dealt directly with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hertzog v. HertzogSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
  2. Thomas v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Colish v. GoldsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Murphy v. Beverly Hills Realty Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Winter v. Iron City Stamping Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pollock Industries, Inc. v. General Steel Castings Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API