Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Patterson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The evidence indicates that, with respect to Counts Nos. 2 and 7, the respondent did not act maliciously or for gain. Indeed, respondent did make restitution to Mrs. Mulholland for the sum which she invested in the corporation.
However, it is one of the fundamental tenets of the professional responsibility of a lawyer that he “ * * * should maintain a degree of personal and professional integrity that meets the highest standard. The integrity of the profession can be maintained only if the conduct of the individual attorney is above reproach.***” Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Stein (1972), 29 Ohio…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. SteinOhio Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by5 opinions
- Prahinski v. PrahinskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Geauga County Bar Ass'n v. PattersonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Disciplinary Counsel v. MasonOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Geauga County Bar Ass'n v. PattersonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Prahinski v. PrahinskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990