Legal Opinion

Mark Silguero v. CSL Plasma, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 23, 2018No. 17-41206PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, Circuit Judge:

*325 CSL Plasma, Inc. is a plasma collection center that will pay anyone who passes its screening test to donate plasma. Mark Silguero and Amy Wolfe are both individuals with disabilities who attempted to donate plasma but whom CSL Plasma deferred for reasons they allege related to their disabilities. Silguero used a cane and had a limp; Wolfe had anxiety and required the use of a service animal. Silguero and Wolfe sued under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") and Chapter 121 of the Texas Human Resources Code ("THRC"). The district court granted summary judgment in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Watson v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. PGA Tour, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Chickasaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mark Silguero and Amy Wolfe v. Csl Plasma, IncorporatedTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  2. George Matheis, Jr. v. CSL Plasma IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  3. Morgan McMillan v. Amazon.com, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  4. Goodrich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  5. Barron v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API