Legal Opinion

Stoll v. New York State College of Veterinary Medicine at Cornell University

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Kaye.

Petitioner, David Stoll, is the attorney for James Maas, a Cornell University professor disciplined for having sexually harassed several female undergraduate students (see, Maas v Cornell Univ., 94 NY2d 87 [decided today]). Stoll filed a request *165under the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) seeking from Cornell any complaints brought under the University’s Campus Code of Conduct, “including any complaints made to a supervisor, department head or the Judicial Administrator * * * by or against any administrator, professor or student of any statutory college…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Maas v. Cornell UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Capital Newspapers v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Encore College Bookstores, Inc. v. Auxiliary Service Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Daily Gazette Co. v. City of SchenectadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Russo v. Nassau County Community CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maas v. Cornell UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Curto v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
  3. Alderson v. New York State College of AgricultureNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Alderson v. New York State College of Agriculture & Life Sciences at Cornell UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Stoll v. COLL. OF VETERINARYNew York Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API